2001-05-08                     House Journal                      Page 1736
HB 172                                                                                            
Representative James moved and asked unanimous consent that the                                     
House consider the Senate message (page 1709) on the following at                                   
this time:                                                                                          
                                                                                                    
      CS FOR HOUSE BILL NO. 172(FIN) am                                                             
      "An Act relating to therapeutic courts for offenders and to the                               
      authorized number of superior court judges."                                                  

2001-05-08                     House Journal                      Page 1737
and                                                                                                 
                                                                                                    
      SENATE CS FOR CS FOR HOUSE BILL NO. 172(FIN)                                                  
      "An Act relating to therapeutic courts for offenders; to the                                  
      authorized number of superior court judges; amending Rule 35,                                 
      Alaska Rules of Criminal Procedure; and providing for an                                      
      effective date."                                                                              
                                                                                                    
 (technical title change)                                                                           
                                                                                                    
                                                                                                    
There being no objection, it was so ordered.                                                        
                                                                                                    
                                                                                                    
Representative James moved that the House concur in the Senate                                      
amendment to CSHB 172(FIN) am, thus adopting SCS CSHB
(FIN), and recommended that the members vote yes.                                                
                                                                                                    
The question being:  "Shall the House concur in the Senate                                          
amendment to CSHB 172(FIN) am?"  The roll was taken with the                                        
following result:                                                                                   
                                                                                                    
SCS CSHB 172(FIN)                                                                                   
Concur                                                                                              
                                                                                                    
YEAS:  37   NAYS:  0   EXCUSED:  0   ABSENT:  3                                                   
                                                                                                    
Yeas:  Bunde, Chenault, Cissna, Coghill, Crawford, Dyson, Fate,                                     
Foster, Green, Guess, Halcro, Harris, Hayes, Hudson, James, Joule,                                  
Kapsner, Kerttula, Kohring, Kookesh, Kott, Lancaster, Masek,                                        
McGuire, Meyer, Morgan, Moses, Mulder, Murkowski, Ogan, Porter,                                     
Rokeberg, Scalzi, Stevens, Whitaker, Williams, Wilson                                               
                                                                                                    
Absent:  Berkowitz, Croft, Davies                                                                   
                                                                                                    
And so, the House concurred in the Senate amendment, thus adopting                                  
SCS CSHB 172(FIN).                                                                                  
                                                                                                    
Representative James moved and asked unanimous consent that the                                     
roll call on the passage of the bill be considered the roll call on the                             
effective date clause.  There being no objection, it was so ordered.                                
                                                                                                    

2001-05-08                     House Journal                      Page 1738
Representative James moved and asked unanimous consent that the                                     
roll call on the passage of the bill be considered the roll call on the                             
court rule change.  There being no objection, it was so ordered.                                    
                                                                                                    
The Chief Clerk was instructed to so notify the Senate.                                             
                                                                                                    
SCS CSHB 172(FIN) was referred to the Chief Clerk for enrollment.